File Name: difference between legal theory and jurisprudence .zip
Philosophy of law , also called jurisprudence , branch of philosophy that investigates the nature of law , especially in its relation to human values, attitudes, practices, and political communities. Traditionally, philosophy of law proceeds by articulating and defending propositions about law that are general and abstract—i. Philosophy of law often aims to distinguish law from other systems of norms, such as morality see ethics or other social conventions.
Skip to Main Content - Keyboard Accessible
The word jurisprudence derives from the Latin term juris prudentia, which means "the study, knowledge, or science of law. Legal philosophy has many aspects, but four of them are the most common:. Apart from different types of jurisprudence, different schools of jurisprudence exist. Formalism , or conceptualism, treats law like math or science. Formalists believe that a judge identifies the relevant legal principles, applies them to the facts of a case, and logically deduces a rule that will govern the outcome of the dispute.
Philosophy of law
The history of law is in no small part the history of its boundaries. The tendency is best resisted, however, for it mistakenly suggests that only the tools of philosophy, and in practice only the tools of contemporary analytic philosophy, are suited to examining the nature of law itself, as opposed to law in particular places, and as opposed to particular branches of law. Nevertheless, the focus of this Essay is on that form of jurisprudence commonly understood as philosophy of law, even though, as will be apparent, there will be necessary excursions into those parts of jurisprudence that are decidedly less philosophical, and to those aspects of jurisprudential inquiry often ignored by contemporary practitioners of analytic philosophy of law. Joseph H. Beale, Jr. Seen through eyes, the student complaint that decisions by English judges on topics such as mortgages and specific performance of contracts were not law seems bizarre.
LAW 516 Jurisprudence and Legal Theory
Law is a system of rules created and enforced through social or governmental institutions to regulate behavior,  with its precise definition a matter of longstanding debate. Private individuals may create legally binding contracts , including arbitration agreements that adopt alternative ways of resolving disputes to standard court litigation. The creation of laws themselves may be influenced by a constitution , written or tacit, and the rights encoded therein. The law shapes politics , economics , history and society in various ways and serves as a mediator of relations between people.
Lawyers are typically interested in the question: What is the law on a particular issue? This is always a local question and answers to it are bound to differ according to the specific jurisdiction in which they are asked. In contrast, philosophy of law is interested in the general question: What is Law? This general question about the nature of law presupposes that law is a unique social-political phenomenon, with more or less universal characteristics that can be discerned through philosophical analysis.
The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law brings together articles by twenty-six of the foremost legal theorists currently writing, to provide an overview of jurisprudential scholarship. Each article presents an account of the contending views and scholarly debates animating their field of enquiry as well as setting the agenda for further study. This publication covers the fields of legal theory and legal scholarship and philosophy, and it delves into current jurisprudential thinking. It offers an overview of the contending theories and debates alongside original analysis. Keywords: jurisprudence , philosophy of law , jurisprudential scholarship , scholarly debates , legal theory , philosophy , jurisprudential thinking.